CARNEGIE
HALL (1947)
I feel incredibly lucky to have spent my
formative years in the 20th Century. Television, before it became an
instrument of division, was the great equalizer, especially in the 1960s and
‘70s. With just three networks, PBS and a handful of local outlets, everyone
was exposed to the same programming; limiting maybe, but it also created a
broadly educated populace, exposing us to everything from novelists, painters,
classical musicians to pop stars, athletes, movie actors, filmmakers and
comics. Not just the latest arrivals to success, but the entire roster of the
century, from before movies talked or radio existed.
On any given weekday in the 1960s, Louis
Armstrong, Irving Berlin, Leonard Bernstein, John Lennon, Salvador Dalí, James
Baldwin, Henny Youngman, Marlon Brando, Wilt Chamberlain or Alfred Hitchcock
could show up on talk shows hosted by Mike Douglas, Merv Griffin, Johnny Carson
and Dick Cavett. And then, on Sunday evening, America’s ultimate ringmaster, Ed
Sullivan, might have a lineup of comedian Shecky Greene, pop sensation Herman’s
Hermits, opera star Joan Sutherland, a Bulgarian juggling act and Topo Gigio
((if you don’t know, don’t ask). Ludicrous, but as mind expanding as any
psychedelic drug. (Worth checking out: “Sunday Best,” a new Netflix documentary
on Sullivan and his role in promoting African-American performers.)
While my generation embraced the rock ‘n’
roll of Bob Dylan and the Rolling Stones and the films of Al Pacino and Robert
De Niro, in our consciousness from these variety shows or news reports was
Gershwin, Hepburn, Ellington, Stravinsky, Picasso and Capote---creating a
palette in which 100 years of artistic disciplines mingled.
Which brings me to “Carnegie Hall,” a compendium of classical music set in the New York City concert cathedral. This isn’t a documentary made for the classroom but a 2-hour and 24-minute feature that post-war hoi polloi went to see at their neighborhood theater, providing a chance to witness pianist Arthur Rubinstein, violinist Jascha Heifetz, conductor Leopold Stokowski, opera singer Lily Pons and many others perform on the recently refurbished Carnegie Hall stage.
In between the lengthy musical sets,
Marsha Hunt plays a woman who rises from Carnegie Hall cleaning lady to booking
the talent in the early part of the century. The drama revolves around her son,
a pianist (William Prince, later a busy character actor into the 1970s) who
turns away from the classics after joining Vaughn Monroe’s big band.
But it’s the collection of mostly European
musicians who are the real stars and, of course, the music of Chopin,
Beethoven, Tchaikovsky, Mozart and Wagner as played in this legendary venue.
The film is artfully shot by veteran cinematographer William Miller and
directed by Edgar G. Ulmer, best known for his low-budget film noir “Detour”
(1945).
It’s one thing to enjoy a movie, but it’s
another to be awe-struck by the actual existence of a production; “Carnegie
Hall” is like the “Woodstock” of 20th Century classical music, a
monument to the power of great performances set in the Seventh Avenue concert
venue that has remained a pillar of American arts excellence since 1891.
SUPERMAN
(2025)
I guess there’s no point in complaining
about a basic fact of life: Hollywood will never stop remaking “Spiderman” and
“Superman” movies. I have nothing against franchises but rebooting a movie
series strikes me as a vast waste of talent and money. I half expect to hear
about plans for another set of “Harry Potters.”
I actually enjoyed the 2013’s “Man of
Steel” that starred Henry Cavill as Clark Kent—it gave him an interesting
backstory and featured a moving performance by Diane Lane as his adoptive
mother. Of course, the late 1970s Christopher Reeve-Richard Donner pictures
were landmarks of a sort, but, truthfully, haven’t aged well.
As usual, in the new version Superman is
played by a strong-jawed, male model type, David Corenswet, a Juilliard grad in
his first major role, but for once the script—by director James Gunn from the
original comic book by Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster—dispenses with the cat-and-mouse
games between our hero and co-worker Los Lane (Rachel Brosnahan, star of “The
Marvelous Mrs. Maisel”). They are romantically involved when the film begins
and, shockingly, she knows he’s a superhero.
Nicholas Hoult (a rather dull actor who
also starred in “Nosferatu” and “Juror #2”) portrays arch-rival Lex Luthor, who
runs a high-tech paramilitary group deeply entrenched with the American
government. (Any resemblance to 2025 reality is strenuously denied.)
Luthor effortlessly convinces the public
and political leaders that Superman is a bad guy who needs to be put down. Lex
even has his own private prison he built in another dimension (well, almost
Florida).
The film is saved, or at least made
tolerable, by Gunn adding a bit of the brand of humor found in his “Guardians
of the Galaxy” films, when a trio of superheroes, called the Justice Gang
(they’re still working on that name) jump into the fray. The gang’s Mr.
Terrific (Edi Gathegi) is the film’s real hero.
This version also gives Jimmy Olsen
(Skyler Gisondo) something to do beyond saying “Gee Whiz Clark!” He plays an
important role in undercovering Luthor’s evil plan and, actually, has a
girlfriend.
In 2035, when someone reboots “Superman”
yet again, I’m hoping they age the Man of Steel a bit; have him face a
middle-age crisis or even contemplate retirement. It certainly would be an
improvement over telling the same story yet again as if a new cast and updated
special effects make any difference.
EDDINGTON
(2025)
It’s been a couple of weeks since I saw
this patched-together collection of incidents involving a slow-witted,
loud-mouth sheriff in Eddington, a small, dusty town in New Mexico, and I’m
still not sure what I think of it.
Joaquin Phoenix stars as Sheriff Joe Cross,
who vigilantly opposes mask wearing even as COVID starts spreading across the
country, and then turns his rivalry with the town’s slick, politically
connected mayor (Pedro Pascal) into a live-action version of the Elmer Fudd-Bugs
Bunny feud. Adding to Cross’ chaotic world is his unstable wife (a slumming
Emma Stone), a mother-in-law obsessed with internet-fueled conspiracies (Deirdre
O’Connell) and a half-baked street preacher (Austin Butler) who muddles the sheriff’s
already tentative marriage.
I know writer-director Ari Aster (“Hereditary,” “Beau Is Afraid”) wants audiences to laugh at these clueless, occasionally racist, insistently uninformed characters but they cut a bit too close to what much of America has become, from one-stoplight communities to the White House, for me to be amused. Films usually offer at least one character who audiences can hang their hat on, providing either hope or at least of semblance of sanity as everything goes to hell in a handbasket. Not in “Eddington.”
Phoenix, who has a history of making
confounding movies, manages to hold this jigsaw puzzle of a picture together,
even as his character zig-zags all over the spectrum.
At worst, “Eddington” is underhandedly
racist (making light of Black Lives Matter protests) and uninformed (mocking
those worried about COVID), but maybe it’s just poorly written and sloppily
directed.
THE
NAKED GUN (2025)
Another week, another reboot.
Thirty-seven years ago, David and Jerry
Zucker and Jim Abrahams, following their surprise smash hit “Airplane!” (1980),
adapted their cult-classic television satire “Police Squad!” to create in one
of the most original movie comedies of the era.
The new version plays like one of the
less-successful sequels, which grew less and less clever and more reliant on
the bumbling idiocy of Lt. Frank Drebin, played to perfection by Leslie
Nielsen.
The difficulty in replacing Nielsen was
probably one reason it took more than a generation to get this guaranteed
money-maker back in theaters. Liam Neeson plays the son (don’t do the math!) of
Drebin, doing his best to capture the clueless inept detective, but he tries
way too hard, turning too many set-pieces into half-baked SNL-like skits. And,
needless to say, the actor is a tad too old for the role at 73. Surely, they
could have found an actor in his 50s (Josh Brolin, Daniel Craig, even Hugh
Jackman would have been good candidates) and avoided what felt to me like Harrison
Ford in another “Indiana Jones.” Nielsen, despite his snow-white hair, hadn’t
hit 70 when the final sequel, “Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult” was released
in 1994.
One can’t help but smile when at the
center of the film is an invention to rule the world called “P.L.O.T. Device.”
But the idea of a wealthy megalomaniac (Danny Huston) determined to control
humanity is so omnipresent in American films that it’s tired even in a satire.
But it leads Drebin and his sidekick Ed Hocken Jr. (son of his namesake who was
played by George Kennedy in the 1988 movie) to femme fatale Beth Davenport
(Pamela Anderson) and a flurry of double entendres.
As Hocken, Paul Walter Hauser, terrific in “I, Tonya” and “Richard Jewell,” disappears for most of the film, but Neeson and Anderson work well together (they apparently are a couple now). But again, the writers try too hard: There’s a long romantic sequence between the two of them and a snowman that is more creepy than funny.
Co-writer and director Akiva Schaffer
overloads the film with verbal and dramatic irony but can’t get around the
paper-thin plot and Neeson’s stiff persona.
And sadly, there’s only one, very
fleeting, O.J. Simpson joke (he played the third detective Nordberg in the
first trilogy). Were they worried someone would think a “Naked Gun” movie was
tasteless?
“Police
Squad!” lasted just six episodes on ABC in 1982 but remains one of the most
admired TV series of the era, scoring Emmy nominations for Nielsen and the
writers. Filled with goofy sight gags and non sequiturs, the show satirized the detective/cop shows of the 1960s
and ‘70s.
One of the highlights of every show was
the introduction of the guest star followed by their quick demise. (Lorne
Greene rolling out of a car after a drive-by; Florence Henderson gunned down in
her kitchen.) The series opened the door for the more risqué and violence, all
for laughs of course, sequences in the big-screen version.
CRIME
IN THE STREET (1956)
Judging by the motion pictures of the era,
the only thing Americans of the 1950s worried more about than nuclear
annihilation was teenage delinquency. Among the movies warning parents about
their suddenly dangerous teens included “Rebel Without a Cause,” “The Wild
One,” “Blackboard Jungle,” “The Delinquents” and “West Side Story”
(knife-wielding dancers!).
I had never seen “Crime in the Street”
until it recently aired on TCM, but it actually is one of the more realistic,
thoughtful looks at the phenomenon, superbly scripted by Reginald Rose, whose
“12 Angry Men” is among the most insightful teleplays ever penned.
John Cassavetes, a year away from his
star-making role in “Edge of the City,” plays hot-headed Frankie, who’s angry
at everyone he encounters and repeatedly ignores the overtures of a persistent
social worker (James Whitmore). Living with his single mother (Virginia Gregg
in an impressive performance) and his little brother, Frankie is happiest when
he’s hanging with his gang (played by Sal Mineo and future director Mark
Rydell) on the street corner.
Near the end, Frankie’s mother offers an
explanation of the family’s plight, delivered with the emotional gravitas of a
scene from an Arthur Miller play. It’s the film’s high-water mark but the long
scenes between Whitmore and Cassavetes are as heartfelt as anything in “Rebel”
or “Blackboard Jungle,” despite its studio-bound sets.
The movie solidified Don Siegel’s status
as one of the most skilled directors of low-budget film, coming just a few
months after “Invasion of the Body Snatchers.” By the 1970s, Siegel was among
Hollywood’s top filmmakers with hits “Dirty Harry” (1971), “Charley Varrick”
(1973) and “The Shootist” (1976), while serving as Clint Eastwood’s directing
mentor.
F1:
THE MOVIE (2025)
While it doesn’t measure up to recent car
racing movies—“Ferrari” (2023), “Ford v Ferrari” (2019) or “Rush” (2013)—this Formula
One tale offers an engaging neophyte vs. veteran story that smartly spends most
of its time on the track.
While the movie would have benefitted from a
30-minute trim, the casually charismatic presence of Brad Pitt sustains even
the repetitive scenes of racing strategy, juvenile bickering and inspirational
speeches. Clearly, director Joseph Kosinski (“Tron: Legacy” and “Top Gun:
Maverick”) is most at home meshing CGI with high-speed stunts.
(As
a pointless aside, I hope someone can explain the film’s title: is the point to
not confuse it with “F1: The Novel” or “F1: The Aftershave”?)
In “The Movie,” Pitt plays Sonny Hayes, a
driver whose career was short-circuited by a major crash that put him out of
action for a decade, now drawn back into the sport by his long-ago mentor Ruben
(Javier Bardem, despite, in real life, being six years Pitt’s junior). You’ve
heard the dialogue between Sonny and Ruben in dozens of films as he tries to
lure his aging protégé onto his team.
This doesn’t go over well with Ruben’s No.
1 driver Joshua Pearce (Damson Idris, star of the FX series “Snowfall”), who is
more interested in social media fame than finishing first on the track.
The most interesting nonracing scenes are
those between Sonny and the lead engineer of Ruben’s team, Kate McKenna, played
with unpretentious command by Kerry Condon, who scored a 2022 Oscar nomination
for “The Banshees of Inisherin.”
At this point in his career, Pitt, 61 but
looking 45, doesn’t need much of a character to dominate a movie; in “F1” it’s
as if Cliff Booth of “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood” has taken up Formula One
racing. (In actuality, director David Fincher is shooting a follow-up to
Quentin Tarantino’s picture, focusing on Pitt’s character.)
Though he’s been a movie star for decades,
he’s grown into a more controlled, thoughtful actor starting with “Inglourious
Basterds” (2009) and “Moneyball” (2011); I suspect his best work still lies
ahead.
NO
SUDDEN MOVE (2021)
For the life of me, I can’t imagine why
this well-written, atmospheric thriller filled with a nonstop twists and turns,
written and directed by Steven Soderbergh, went straight to HBO/MAX after
screenings at film festivals. (Can we blame COVID?)
While Soderbergh’s films can become overly wordy and his characters too often exude unearned cool (his latest, “Black Bag” left me cold), “No Sudden Move” allows two of the best actors in the business, Don Cheadle and Benicio del Toro turn the hostage story into a character study.
Del Toro’s Ronald Russo doesn’t hide his
displeasure when he’s partnered with a black man (the film is set in 1950s
Detroit), but a job’s a job. He and Cheatle’s Curt Goynes, fresh out of prison,
are tasked by a mid-level mobster (Brendan Fraser) to take an accountant (David
Harbour) and his family hostage, demanding he steal a highly secretive report
concerning the auto industry. The plan goes by the book until the gang’s third
man (Kieran Culkin) removes his mark in front of the family and complications
start gumming up the works every time a gun is drawn.
Few contemporary directors are more
accomplished at keeping audience guessing about the direction of the plot while
giving his actors plenty of room to become more than chess pieces. The film was
written by Ed Solomon, best known for “Men in Black.”
Del Toro and Cheadle, both perfect
exemplars of “world weary” acting, constantly glance at each other with that
“we’re too old for this crap” look. And they have plenty of support, with Jon
Hamm as a corruptible cop, Ray Liotta as the man behind the plot and longtime
character actor Bill Duke, who shows up in the last act looking for his cut.
Soderbergh can’t resist bring in an
overly talkative figure near the end to provide the complicated backstory, but
the film survives it.
Joaquin Phoenix in "Eddington." (A24)
Benicio del Toro and Don Cheadle in "No Sudden Move." (HBO/MAX)
1 comment:
The Beloved Spouse™ and I saw F1 a few weeks ago; now we’re Formula 1 fans, watching the races every Sunday since. It’s a predictable story we’re all seen a thousand times, but it’s also a good example of how outstanding execution can overcome other weaknesses. Much as we liked the racing, what hooked us more was the behind-the-scenes looks at the technology.
About Brad Pitt, I don’t know if I’ve even seen him in a movie he didn’t make better, even some that weren’t very good. It’s great to hear the sequel to OUATIH will focus on his character, who was the most interesting in the original.
I never heard of NO SUDDEN MOVES before reading about it here, but with three of our favorites (del Toro, Cheadle, and Liotta), we’re going to have to watch it.
Post a Comment