PARASITE (2019)
The film introduces the seemingly
hapless Kim family as they all pitch-in to make a bit of money folding pizza
boxes. Squeezed into their hovel of a home, living hand to mouth, you’d never
guess what this South Korean family is capable of.
What begins as a simple story of doing
whatever it takes to survive turns into an unrelenting examination of human
dignity, the growing gap between those at the top and those at the bottom and
the manner in which we see and treat others.
The film,
superbly acted by the entire cast and brilliantly directed by acclaimed Korean
filmmaker Bong Joon Ho (“Mother,” “Snowpiercer”), working from a script he
wrote with Jin Wan Han, veers from comic to tragic in a split second while
never losing its focus on the human impact of self-centered decisions. This
Palme d’Or winner is 2019’s best movie and one of the finest foreign-language
pictures I’ve seen in years.
The action
kicks into gear when the family’s son (Choi Woo Shik) scores a job tutoring the
high school-aged daughter of a wealthy family. The love-hungry daughter
immediately becomes enamored, giving him leverage as he convinces the naïve mother
(Cho Yeo Jeong) to hire an acquaintance (actually, his sister, played by Park So
Dam) as an art therapist for her unruly son.
Before long, the
father (Song Kang Ho) is employed as the husband’s driver and the wife (Chang
Hyae Jin) replaces the devoted housekeeper (Lee Jung Eun) who they trick out of
the job.
This is just
the beginning of this incredibly dense, wild domestic horror film that sprinkles
elements of master filmmakers like Akira Kurosawa, David Lynch and Luis Bunuel into
this very 21st Century look at economic and social disparity.
While I have
always been reluctant to judge acting in non-English pictures as I have no way
of properly judging how effectively lines are delivered, the performers in
“Parasite,” all three families of the story, seemed so immersed in their roles
that the almost surreal aspects of the plot came off as completely believable.
And while Bong is
clearly attacking the upper one percent, he doesn’t turn them into easily hated
targets; in fact, their gullibility and self-importance makes them more pitiful
than despicable.
The huge chasm
between the cramped, almost desperate lifestyle of the Kims and the sleek, cold
modernism of the Parks’ home, precisely captured by cinematographer Hong Kyung
Pyo, offers, without a single line of dialogue, a powerful metaphor for the
challenge the world faces in 2019 and beyond.
FORD V. FERRARI (2019)
If auto racing
is a sport—the eternal debate among fans and detractors—James Mangold’s
thrilling re-creation of the legendary rivalry between U.S. auto maker Henry
Ford II and Italy’s race car mogul Enzo Ferrari is one of the best sports
movies ever made.
Few, if any,
sports pictures have been better acted, written sans the usual portion of
sentimentality and included so many thoroughly convincing and riveting
competition sequences.
Ford (a
terrifically gruff and arrogant Tracy Letts) son of the iconic founder is
persuaded by a young, ambitious executive named Lee Iacocca (later CEO of
Chrysler and the face of the industry in the 1980s and ‘90s) that the company
need to build a race car to add some sizzle to the brand and attract younger
buyers.
The designer
Iacocca (Jon Bernthal) selects to put Ford in the running at the prestigious Le
Mans Race is former driver Carroll Shelby, who by the 1960s was customizing
engines at his Los Angeles-based company. Of course, in a classic clash of
creativity and business, Shelby constantly butts heads with the other Ford
executive, mostly over his instance of using rough-around-the-edges British
ex-patriot driver Ken Miles (Christian Bale, yet again hitting the mark
perfectly).
As the film
chronicles the experimenting and competitions leading up to the 1966 Le Mans,
the brotherly relationship between Shelby and Miles serves as the heart of the
story. They seem polar opposites yet share the burning desire to go faster and
faster and cross the finish line first.
Mangold, who has
shown in the past that he’s a first-rate storyteller and knows how to craft a
crowd-pleasing, well-acted film (“Walk the Line,” “3:10 to Yuma”), again turns
out a superbly paced movie that builds toward the big race without becoming
tedious or overdramatic. This picture is more accomplish than anything he’s
done, combining the messy left turns of real life with the intensity of the
racetrack into an entertaining feature, smartly written by Jez and John-Henry
Butterworth and Jason Keller.
The POV racing
sequences make you feel like you’re part of the race; the 24-hour French race
actually feels like the physical and mental marathon it must be. Phedon
Papamichael, who earned an Oscar nod for “Nebraska” and has shot most of
Mangold’s films, provides the inventive, edge-of-your-seat cinematography.
Damon, a solid
actor who always seems to be trying too hard, looks more comfortable, authentic,
relax than usual, maybe knowing that he can play Shelby with cool command in a
wide-brimmed cowboy hat, as Bale delivers in the showier, fiery role. He’s at
his best in a showdown with Ford after his team failed in its first try at Le
Mans.
Still somewhat
under the radar, Bale keeps delivering memorable performances as he has compiled
a diverse collection of recent roles, staring with the “Dark Knight” films and
then continuing in “The Fighter” (2010), “American Hustle” (2013), “The Big
Short” (2015), “Hostiles” (2017) and “Vice” (2018). As Miles, he has the rare chance to use his
natural British accent while turning the renegade driver into the classic
American film character: thoroughly professional, anti-authority and answering
only to his own moral compass. It should earn the 45-year-old his fifth Oscar
nomination.
The supporting
cast is equally strong, including Letts, Bernthal as the enthusiastic Iacocca,
Ray McKinnon as Damon’s righthand man and 14-year-old star-in-the-making Noah
Jupe (“A Quiet Place”) as Miles’ beloved son.
While I have
zero interest in car racing, I was more entertained by “Ford v Ferrari” than
any film this year. It’s a perfect melding of the gear-head details of
engineering and aerodynamics with the machismo of racing as seen through two
charismatic legends of the sport.
RICHARD JEWELL (2019)
It’s all a
matter of perspective. Director Clint Eastwood and screenwriter Billy Ray
clearly intended the moral of this re-telling of the investigation into the
1996 Atlanta Olympic bombing to be that both the FBI and the media
thoughtlessly destroy people’s lives in the name of uncovering the truth. The
message I came away with was that the press puts way too much trust in what law
enforcement disperses out to them.
If you’re
unaware of the case, Richard Jewell (impressively portrayed by Paul Walter
Hauser, who played a similar role as the “bodyguard” in “I, Tonya”) was the
security guard who first alerted authorities to a suspicious backpack during
pre-Olympic festivities in an Atlanta park. Despite his and others’ efforts,
the home-made pipe bomb exploded, killing two and injuring over 100. While
Jewell was first portrayed in the press as a hero, a leak by the FBI led to
reports that Jewell was the prime suspect in the planting of the bomb.
Sam Rockwell
plays a lawyer and former co-worker of Jewell’s, who takes up his case, quickly
realizing that law enforcement’s only hope is to pressure Jewell to admit to
the crime, utilizing the media to paint him as a loner desperate for attention
and Jewell’s naïve admiration for cops of all stripes.
The story is a
stark example of how society, both officially and gossipy, continues to judge
the value of someone by outward appearances. Jewell, who died of a heart attack
in 2007, was overweight, lived with his mother and tended to overstep his
bounds no matter what low-level job he held. This “evidence” seemed to be given
more credence than the facts of the case.
There has been a
backlash against the film’s portrayal of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter,
Kathy Scruggs, who first broke the story of the FBI’s case against Jewell. In
the movie, she is shown offering sexual favors to the lead FBI investigator
(Jon Hamm) for a scoop. That has been disputed by the paper and other reporters
and would probably never have shown up in the film if she was alive to defend
herself or sue.
That a woman,
especially a reporter, is portrayed offensively in a Hollywood movie shouldn’t
surprise anyone. For me, what was even more offensive was showing her crying
during a press conference given by Jewell’s mother (Kathy Bates, excellent as
always). That wouldn’t have happened, and neither would the scene in which
Jewell and his lawyer visit the newsroom and berate her. (Oddly, they then go
into a meeting with the editor, but we are never shown what came of that). Ray, who wrote and directed the excellent
“Shattered Glass” (about plagiarist Stephen Glass) and co-wrote “State of
Play,” another newspaper film, should be more knowledge about how newsrooms
work; he relies on tired clichés in this new film.
In truth, there’s
not much plot to “Richard Jewell,” but it remains interesting throughout
because of the first-rate work of Rockwell and Hauser along with the abiding
storytelling skills of 89-year-old Eastwood.
THE LIGHTHOUSE (2019)
Setting is one
of the most underrated elements of a successful film. Most great movies turn
its location, both real and the sets, into another character. But few films have
used the setting as the dominate element of the story like this quirky,
dreamlike picture by director Robert Eggers.
The lighthouse
of the title sits on an unhospitable rocky island off the eastern Canadian
coast, where two mismatched men enact a mythological tale of power, ego and
loneliness. Winslow (Robert Paterson) is the neophyte apprentice, assisting the
grizzled, domineering lighthouse keeper Thomas (Willem Dafoe, looking very 19th
Century), who orders around the younger man with sadomasochistic glee.
The film, shot in
gritty black and white by Jarin Blaschke —it reminded me of Guy Maddin’s
gloriously bizarre creations—details in sweaty, filthy detail the unrelenting
labor Winslow carries out each day to keep the pre-electricity lighthouse
glowing.
There’s not much
to the story, in fact there are probably at least two too many scenes of them
drinking themselves into drunken stupors and acting like children, but this
isn’t a film about story, it’s about a mood, atmosphere, human character under
duress and harshness of surviving day after day after day.
The movie also
offers another off-beat, unforgettably performance by the 64-year-old Dafoe,
who has been a major presence, but criminally underappreciated, in American film
since the mid-1980s. Just in the past
few years, he has earned Oscar nominations for his sympathetic landlord in “The
Florida Project” (2017) and his heartbreaking portrayal of Vincent van Gogh in
“Eternity’s Gate” (2018), while continuing as a regular in Wes Anderson films.
This year, he
also plays the central figure in the mystery of “Motherless Brooklyn” and the
title character in two Abel Ferrara’s films, “Tommasu,” about an artist working
in Italy and “Pasolini,” a bio-pic of Italian filmmaker Pier Paolo Pasolini.
And then he shows up in last year’s “Murder on the Orient Express.”
Here’s something
to look forward to: Dafoe is among the cast of Guillermo del Toro’s remake of
the 1947 carnival-noir Tyrone Power picture “Nightmare Alley” that will star
Cate Blanchett and Bradley Cooper.
DOWNTON ABBEY (2019)
Few prime-time soap operas have been
treated with such respect as this well-written, superbly acted British import
created by screenwriter Julian Fellowes that ran on public television from 2010
through 2015.
Starting with the
sinking of the Titanic in 1912, which forever changes the future prospects of
the Crawley family, through the growing modernism of post World War I England, both
the privileged and their help staff reflect a society that is going through seismic
changes.
Juggling no
less than two dozen major character, Fellowes, who wrote every episode of the
series and this movie, developed each with the kind of detailed care one rarely
finds in filmed drama, allowing them come alive for viewers as if they were
part of an epic novel.
While Maggie
Smith as the dowager countess of the family, Violet Crawley garnered most of
the accolades, the actors who turned essential stock characters—the show owes a
great debt to the British classic “Upstairs, Downstairs”—include Jim Carter as
the imperious, loyal-to-a-fault butler Carson; Hugh Bonneville as Robert, the
earl of the manor; Elizabeth McGovern, the American wife of Robert; Laura
Carmichael as their neglected middle daughter Edith, who eventually has her day;
Joanne Froggatt as the devoted wife of Bates, the master’s dresser, who fights
various battles with law enforcement; and Robert James-Collier as Barrow,
footman turned butler who begins the series as a despicable troublemaker but
eventually earns the viewers’ sympathy.
Most of the cast
is back for the movie, but not, ironically, the one cast member who has become
a film star, Lily James, who in the series was the dowager’s rebellious young
niece. But in the world of “Downton
Abbey,” she’d hardly be missed.
The movie is a
much-anticipated visit with old friends working out old and new challenges,
allowing audiences to smile or tear up as we’re updated on characters’ lives.
But as a movie that should stand on its own, it is hopeless. There is little
attempt to re-introduce the characters or set up the relationships anew. The
story revolves around a royal visit to the Abbey by King George V (Simon Jones)
and Queen Mary (Geraldine James).
Fellowes and
director Michael Engler (TV veteran who worked on “Sex and the City” and “Six
Feet Under”) rightly assumed that no one was going to wander into this film without
having at least experienced a handful of “Downton Abbey” the TV series. I can’t
recall a film made so exclusively for a select TV audience.
Yet it’s done
well at the box office, with close to $100 million in receipts in North
America. The line between television, be it old traditional networks, cable or
streaming, and the cinema is very quickly crumbling; in another 20 years will
anyone even recognize the difference?
SOUVENIR (2019)
I’ve always
prided myself on being empathetic to other’s plight in life, a trait that I
think contributes to my interest in movies and the variety of lives one experience
through the cinema.
But as I age, I
find myself becoming less tolerant of those who make one bad decision after
another, while—in the case of film characters—expecting audiences to
sympathize.
That attitude
colors my opinion of this critically lauded indie (some have put it on Top 10
lists) that came out earlier this year. Julie (Honor Swinton Byrne) is a
college film student who barely seems awake most of the time. I would expect
someone pursuing a career in film to be full of ideas and energy.
But she is
anything but that, which may explain why she’s attracted to low-key Anthony
(Tom Burke), a well-to-do foreign minister in the British government. Even
before his dark side is revealed, he comes off as a petulant, arrogantly
sarcastic bore.
Julie acts
oblivious when she doesn’t recognize needle track marks on his arms or is
questioned by one his friend as to why she’s hanging out with a heroin addict.
The low-budget,
slow-moving, under-written picture barely kept me awake; if I had seen it in a
dark theater, I would have been dozing 30 minutes in.
“Souvenir,”
named for an 18th Century French painting the couple admires, offers
a few interesting scenes with Julie’s mother (played by her real-life parent
Tilda Swinton), but writer-director Joanna Hogg does nothing to make me care
about this foolish character. Astonishingly, to me, a sequel is in the works
(even indie films have Part II now).
Here’s a tip to
young filmmakers: If you want to receive good notices for your work, include
something about moviemaking in your script and, if possible, cast someone
related to a famous actor. Mainstream critics seems to fall for that every
time.
MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE—FALLOUT (2018)
After six of
these, during which Ethan Hunt (better known as Tom Cruise) has aged from 34 to
57, its difficult to work up much enthusiasm for yet another evildoer from
Hunt’s past with WMDs at his disposal.
But I must admit
that as action films go—and I’m not talking about those that ignore Earthly
physics—this franchise continues to deliver thrilling chases, complex
double-crosses and amusing banter between Hunt and his team, all of which come
off as believable enough to keep me coming back.
What isn’t
believable is that an intelligence agency would keep an operative in the field
who’s older than all his desk-bound bosses and has disregarded direct orders
more often a rebellious teenager. Neither is the beaten-to-the-ground plot
crutch that involves a corrupt or compromised agent playing a crucial role in
every film. There have been more turncoats in “Mission: Impossible” films than
there have been in the entire history of U.S.-British espionage.
One particular
aspect of Hunt—compared to that legendary ladies’ man Bond—is that he never has
time for the sexual assignations that usually are as essential to the genre as
the last-second cutting of red and green wires (or was it the blue and yellow ones?).
Whether to
maintain a PG rating (to increase box office) or something Cruise insists on,
Hunt shows no interest in the temptation of either fellow agents or villainous
seductresses. What kind of spy is that? In “Fallout,” both Hunt’s ex-wife (Michelle
Monaghan) and ex-girlfriend (Rebecca Ferguson) play vital roles, but the only
emotion the stoic agent shows is regret for putting them in harm’s way.
In this episode,
Hunt is still after the plutonium from “Rogue Nation” (2015), now under the control
of renegade Solomon Lane (Sean Harris), a former IMF agent who hates Hunt and
the world. Hunt’s immediate boss (Alec
Baldwin), who once wanted Hunt jailed, is now his biggest fan, while the new
CIA chief (Angela Bassett) sends the hulking August Walker (Henry Cavill) to
keep an eye on Hunt and maybe, if he feels the need, to kill him.
Ving Rhames and
Simon Pegg are back as Hunt’s comrades in arms as is director Christopher
McQuarrie, who orchestrated the previous film and is signed up for the next
two.
And then there’s
Lalo Schifrin’s theme music, intensifying the action while serving as a
constant reminder of the franchise/TV show’s iconic place in popular culture.
It’s been in our heads for over 50 years and doesn’t seem to be going away.
2 comments:
We don't get to the movies much anymore but I always appreciate your blog posts so we know what to keep an eye open when we're looking to stream something. FORD VS. FERRARI has been in our sights but your revere here nailed it down for me. I used to follow racing much more than I do now and was aware of Shelby, but his more direct influence on my life has been his chili mix, which is outstanding.
I'm also a big fan of Christian Bale. As Western Pennsylvania netives you and I can appreciate better than mosy his performance in OUT OF THE FURNACE, a somewhat weird film in which he (and Willem Dafoe) were outstanding.
What appears to be the key point in the Jewell movie was also made in the outstanding Paul Newman - Sally Field thriller, ABSENCE OF MALICE, where young reporter Field is set up by the Justice Department to cast Newman as the prime suspect in a racket he's not involved in and how he gets his revenge,
Doug: Just got around to this edition a day after watching ``Parasite,'' which is one of the best movies I've seen in, not just years, but ever. My son, Nate, had been touting it and the similarly excellent ``Burning'' for a while. Who could have seen that South Korea would produce two of the best modern directors? Everything fits in ``Parasite.'' We spent an hour last night talking about how clever and complete the director was setting up themes and action. Nate saw lots of stuff he had missed the first time around. Not too many movies any more, even really good ones, get beyond plot and production values and tell a rich, complex story this adroitly. I'm not enough of a cinephile to catch a Bunuel reference, but I did think I saw Jacques Tati nods in the dumbshow background bits.
Per usual, I've seen only a smattering of the nominated films: This, ``The Irishman'' (I think ``Goodfellas'' remains the masterpiece) and ``Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,'' which hit me surprisingly hard in a good way (I think it probably is Tarantino's second best, but I haven't seen all his stuff). Haven't seen Ford/Ferrari yet, but it sounds like a good way to spend a couple of hours. I think your take on Matt Damon is spot on.
Post a Comment