THE GRAND BUDAPEST HOTEL (2014)
The worlds
created by director Wes Anderson aren’t exactly real life but they offer a post-cynical,
dead-pan comic reflection of reality, in which everyone’s emotions are on full
display as if they are speaking the most important words of their lives.
His results
have been hit and miss; “Rushmore” and “Moonrise Kingdom” were great; “The Life
Aquatic with Steve Zissou” and “The Darjeeling Limited” less so. But his newest
confection is sheer delight. He’s conjured up an incredible fairy tale filled
with an unending assortment of distinctive characters, led by the unforgettable
Gustave H.
After the usual Anderson introduction—no one
sets up their films with such detail and humorous sight gags—we arrive at the
heart of the story. A very famous and rich old man (F. Murray Abraham) decides
to tell his life story to an inquisitive writer (Judd Law) who is staying at
the legendary, but nearly deserted Grand Budapest, located in the imaginary
country of Zubrowka.
The film flashes back to the late 1930s when
the hotel was in full flower, under the impeccable guidance of Gustave, concierge
extraordinaire (played to perfection by Ralph Fiennes). Two important things
happen immediately: newly hired Lobby Boy Zero Moustafa becomes Gustave’s protégé
and the departure of 85-year-old Madame D (played like a wide-eyed silent-film
character by Tilda Swinton under stacks of hair), one of the many elderly customers
Gustave is devoted to.
A few weeks later she’s dead, sending Gustave
and Zero on the adventure of their lives as they are chased across Europe by Madame
D’s scheming family.
Fiennes wonderfully measured performance of
this interesting combination of manners, brashness and old-school
resourcefulness carries the film like no actor in an Anderson film has since
Jason Schwartzman in “Rushmore.” The young Zero, played by 17-year-old Tony
Revolori, nearly equals Fiennes for screen presence, and every member of the
supporting cast has a great moment or two. Nearly all are Anderson alumni,
including Willem Dafoe, Adrien Brody, Jeff Goldblum, Harvey Keitel, Bill
Murray, Edward Norton, Owen Wilson, Swinton and Schwartzman.
Inspired by Austrian screenwriter Stefan
Zweig, Anderson and co-writer Hugo Guinness throw into the plot virtually every
cliché of classic mysteries, yet they do it in such an offhanded manner that
you barely notice. The action rarely slows down long enough for us to take in
all the craziness, but it accumulates into a comic tour-de-force, part Marx
Brothers, part Preston Sturges, and a full dose of Wes Anderson.
THE STUNT MAN (1980) and
MY FAVORITE YEAR (1982)
MY FAVORITE YEAR (1982)
Peter O’Toole, who died in December at the age
of 81, became a screen legend at age 30. As the title character of David Lean’s
magnificent “Lawrence of Arabia,” best picture winner in 1962 and acclaimed
since as one of cinema’s towering achievements, O’Toole mesmerized audiences
with his piercing blue eyes, flowing white robes and graceful, almost feminine,
bearing. This young, previously unknown Irish actor became an overnight
sensation, forever linked to the iconic image he and Lean forged out of T.E.
Lawrence.
While the rest of his career only occasionally
lived up to the promise of that galvanizing performance, and only twice after
he turned 40, O’Toole’s infamous carousing—one of the UK’s three prodigious
drinkers, along with Richard Burton and Richard Harris—somehow made up for his
diminished importance on screen. At his death, he was treated as one of the
all-time greats, an acting treasure. Yet, despite his eight best actor
nominations (the most without a win), his rep rested on three films in the
1960s (“Lawrence” along with “Becket” and “The Lion in Winter,” playing Henry
II in both), two rarely seen 1972 cult favorites (“Man of La Mancha” and “The
Ruling Class”) and two quirky pictures in the 1980s (“The Stunt Man” and “My
Favorite Year”).
There aren’t even interesting failures or
forgotten gems in between: Most of his career was spent in overblown epics or
offering jokey bits in second-rate films.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not here to slam the man; at his best he
dominated the screen. Yet his legend rests more on being a first-rate bloke who
lived life to its fullest than his movie career.
He was only 50 (yes, that deserves an “only”)
when he gave his last great performance as Alan Swann, a semi-retired, Errol
Flynn-like movie idol in “My Favorite Year.” Playing Swann’s hedonistic,
self-assured falling-down-drunk side was second nature to O’Toole, but he also
portrays the swashbuckling star as ashamed of his estranged relationship with
his young daughter and absolutely frightened of performing for a live audience.
As wonderfully entertaining the cartoonish aspect of the character is, O’Toole
is equally affecting as the flesh-and-blood man behind the dashing reputation,
who admits, mustering all his honesty, “I’m not an actor…I’m a movie star.”
Scheduled to
appear as the guest star on a 1950s comedy show--modeled on the Sid Caesar’s
show, starring the strutting, self-absorbed
King Kaiser (Joseph Bologna)—Swann arrives drunk, prompting King to
appoint his eager-to-please junior writer Benjy (Mark Linn-Baker) as Swann’s baby
sitter for the week leading up to the show.
Watching it again for the first time since I
saw it in theaters 30 years ago, I was struck by how consistently funny the
film remains. It’s not just the irresistible sarcasm Swann constantly spews out,
but at least a half-dozen brilliantly staged set pieces, courtesy of writers Norman
Steinberg and Dennis Palumbo and actor-turned-director Richard Benjamin.
Laugh out loud funny are Swann’s first meeting
with the show’s staff in the writer’s room (he’s unconscious after an all-night
drunk and Bill Macy’s head writer goes ballistic) and when the star visits
Benjy’s Brooklyn home and his mother (Lainie Kazan at her best), her Filipino
second husband and bemused uncle (veteran comic Lou Jacobi) fawn over Swann.
The sequence is as hilarious as Woody Allen’s best Brooklyn flashbacks,
perfectly capped when they open the door to leave and find all the building’s
tenants stuffed in the small hallway waiting to glimpse the movie legend.
The line
between performing and real life was also the theme of O’Toole’s other
mid-career success, the cult-favorite “The Stunt Man.”
As dictatorial
filmmaker Eli Cross, O’Toole is hammy, outlandish, flip and absolutely perfect.
Though it earned him another best actor Oscar nomination, it’s really a
supporting role as the plot’s focuses on wanted man Cameron (the uncomfortably
stiff Steve Railsback) who becomes the primary stunt man on Cross’ movie shoot.
Manipulative,
ruthless and, judging by the movie scenes portrayed, talentless, Cross takes Cameron
under his wing in an odd, complex relationship at the same time that Cameron
and the picture’s leading lady (Barbara Hershey) become involved. O’Toole spends
most of the film in his director chair on a crane—hovering godlike above
everyone, shouting his sarcastic insults. While it’s not a performance
comparable to his more substantial roles, he’s extraordinarily entertaining as
the stereotypical cliché of a Hollywood director.
These two performances evaluated O’Toole’s
status enough that he remained there for the next 30 years.
His best work after that came as the
pretentious science professor trying to clone his deceased wife in “Creator” (1985)
and as Sir Cedric Charles Willingham in “King Ralph,” who helps tutor a
low-class American (John Goodman) so he can achieve royal status.
His final Oscar nomination came for his role in
“Venus,” as a wise-cracking elderly stage actor (looking older than his 74
years) who bonds with a moody college-age woman. It’s more presence than
performance, but he shows he still has a twinkle in his eye in his 70s as he
flirts with his “Venus.”
Of course,
the reality of contemporary cinema is that there are plenty of superb actors,
but very few real characters who can bring to a film what O’Toole could when he
tried. So maybe I’m nitpicking at the esteemed heaped on the lanky Irishman;
no, he wasn’t a consistently great actor, but, to borrow an Orson Welles line,
“he was some kind of a man.”
BLUE IS THE WARMEST COLOR (2013)
This fascinating French drama, a rather
unadorned coming-of-age story, proves that all a movie really needs is a couple
of well-acted, interesting characters. I can’t say I was looking forward to
watching a three-hour film about a high school girl falling in love with a
twentysomething woman, but the performances of Adele Exarchopoulus as the teen
and Léa Seydoux as her newfound love were so compelling that, even at its unusual
length, I remained riveted to their story.
After an unsatisfying fling with a boy from
school, Adele spots this free-spirited, blue-haired lesbian and is
thunderstruck. She persuades her guy friend to take her to a gay bar, and, as
happens only in the movies, she sees Emma there and then brazenly follows her
to another club where she is introduced.
Quickly, Adele and Emma, a self-absorbed
struggling painter and wannabe intellectual, become inseparable.
Other than the indulgently long, nearly
pornographic, scenes of lovemaking, the film is your typical story of young
love. Adele, younger and inexperienced, feels unworthy in the company of Emma’s
artist friends and soon it becomes an issue. Then, when Adele takes a job at a
kindergarten (not an important enough calling from Emma’s point of view) she is
tempted by a male coworker.
Yet
Exarchopoulus (an extraordinarily talented actress but that name will not fly
in Hollywood) and Seydoux are able to invest so much authenticity into their
characters that they make the cliché plot compelling and the fate of this
couple well worth the picture’s epic length. These two amazing performances
were specifically cited, along with writer-director Abdellatif Kechiche, when
the film won 2013’s Palme d’Or, the top award at the Cannes film festival.
Of course, the movie didn’t really need to be
so long, but wouldn’t you rather watch two people interact, emotionally and
intellectually, in an intensely realistic manner for three hours than stare at
computer generated monsters or spaceships?
THE HUNT (2013)
What European
filmgoers already know—that Mads Mikkelsen is one of the best actors in the
world—will hopefully soon become common knowledge in this country as he’s currently
starring as the legendary Hannibal Lecter in a new NBC series.
Equally
effective as a volatile psychotic and a simple everyman, Mikkelsen is best
known for the intense Danish film “After the Wedding,” playing a conflicted
resistance fighter in “Flame and Citron” and as the cold-blooded, deadly
gambler Le Chiffre in “Casino Royale.”
In “The Hunt,” Mikkelsen plays a soft-spoken,
somewhat naïve daycare worker, who is in the middle of a custody dispute over
his pre-teen son. Then, in the ultimate nightmare for anyone who works with
children, he is accused by his best friend’s young daughter of inappropriate
behavior. The girl barely knows what she’s saying and quickly retracts her
claims, but the daycare supervisor is convinced and soon everyone in this
small, rural Denmark town assumes that Lucas is a pedophile.
The film, directed and co-written by Thomas
Vinterberg (acclaimed for “The Celebration,” which also portrayed people at
their worst), offers a scathing indictment of the petty, small-minded attitudes
of small towns (no different in northern Europe or middle-America) along with a
moving portrayal of a father-son relationship that grows stronger because of
the false accusations.
Sometimes, the reactions of Lucas to these
ridiculous claims are frustrating—in what is probably a typical American
response, I wanted him to fight the charges more aggressively—but Mikkelsen makes
his calm, almost existential approach to the situation understandable and makes
the film more powerful.
ENOUGH SAID
(2013)
I can just hear the potential backers reaction
when writer-director Nicole Holofcener pitched her idea for "Enough Said."
"Wonderfully written Nicole, but we’re
thinking that this might make a perfect vehicle for Emma Watson and Joseph
Gordon-Levitt. Can you adjust the ages a bit...no one really wants to see
anyone over 40 on a date or, my god, in bed."
Let's face it, American movies usually only
address divorced as it effects the children or as one long bad joke. And while
the script for "Enough Said" has its problems, the film impresses
with its honesty in dealing with the anxieties faced by middle-aged people as
they gingerly step back into a relationship and all the complications that
entails.
Eva (Julia Louis-Dreyfus), a divorced Los
Angeles masseuse, is introduced to Albert (James Gandolfini) at a party, just
minutes after she declared that there wasn’t anyone in attendance who she was
attracted to. A week later they have the requisite humorous first date, but
this one feels original and authentic and develops these characters in ways
that aren’t like movie characters, but real people. He’s has an obscure
industry job, appropriately, as a curator of the TV museum and archives.
But not long after their relationship gets
serious, Eva begins having doubts, influenced by a new client of hers, Marianne
(Holofcener regular Catherine Keener), bitter from her divorce and giving Eva
an earful about her loser ex.
The main
attraction of this film is that it was released just after Gandolfini’s death.
He gives a naturalistic, very believable performance, though he’s not as
effective as he was in supporting roles in “Not Fade Away,” “In the Loop” or
“Zero Dark Thirty.”
Louis-Dreyfus is the real star. While her
Elaine is one of the iconic characters of TV sitcom history, I never thought of
her as much of an actress, but she’s superb here, finding just the right mix of
girlish charm and middle-age angst. Her Eva lives in the real world but can’t
help making stupid decisions, acting like a teenager, when it comes to love.
Holofcener has made a series of sometime
pretentious L.A.-centric angst-filled films with women at the center, including
“Lovely and Amazing” (2001), “Friends With Money” (2006) and “Please Give”
(2011), but this is her best, most truthful work.
There’s plenty of L.A. atmosphere, and these
are assuredly SoCal people, not New Yorkers. Without doing my research, I’d say
this may be the best middle-age romance since the Jack Nicholson-Diane Keaton
comedy “Something’s Gotta Give” (2003); and more substantial in its examination
of what it means to make a commitment a second time, later in life. No doubt,
audiences want to see romance sparking between young, attractive people—is
there anything more joyful in life? But occasionally it’s nice to see a pair of
regular folks, not young, not beautiful, to remind us that there is no expiration
date on falling in love.
AIN’T THEM
BODIES SAINTS (2013)
Don't ask me
to explain the title, but I enjoyed this moody, brooding tale of a young woman
and her child left to go it alone after a shootout with police results in a
life sentence for her husband.
At the center of this film is a subtle and
touching performance by Rooney Mara as Ruth. The exact opposite of her
Oscar-nominated turn as Lisbeth Salander, her Ruth is a quiet, reflective
small-town girl whose only joy in life is the love of her daughter, born after
Bob (Casey Affleck) is sent to prison.
Not much happens in this film, writer-director
David Lowrey’s first film with name actors, until Bob escapes from prison and,
despite the hopelessness of the situation, attempts to get back to Ruth and his
daughter.
The direction and photography (by Bradford
Young) is spare and unhurried, filled with wide visas and dark,
available-lighting interiors. No doubt, this film will lead to bigger-budget
opportunities for Lowrey.
In addition to Mara excellent performance is
a rare substantial role for 1970s-80s movie star Keith Carradine. He plays the
town's store keeper and a friend to the couple, who gives Ruth a
place to stay after Bob is incarcerated. It's the meatiest big-screen role
Carradine has had in years. He’s done a ton of TV in the past 20 years but his
last major film role was in 1995 as Buffalo Bill Cody in the Jeff Bridges
vehicle “Wild Bill.”
He’s a comforting presence, adding to the
film’s authenticity with his signature laid-back attitude—he still has the
ability to communicate more with the tilt of his head than most actors can with
a page-long soliloquy.
GRAVITY (2013)
The first
time I saw this astonishing film I was swept up by the incredible adventure,
the heart-in-your-throat thrills, as Dr. Ryan Stone refuses to give up against
impossible odds. Watching it again, even diminished on my 42-inch television,
confirmed by opinion of its greatness, the best of 2013, and that there’s much
more to Alfonso Cuarón’s film than just jaw-dropping CGI and the sublime acting
of Sandra Bullock.
In
literature, it’s second-nature to seek out the symbols and metaphors, to dig beneath
the plot and characters to the real purpose of the author. Yet in films, even
serious, adult movies, we rarely seek out the deeper meanings, the big picture
themes. Especially, in the past 20 years, audience and even critics have
reduced the cinema into a simple amusement, no more intellectual than TV, pop
music or a Broadway musical. I would argue that all those forms are capable of
offering insights into life just as relevant as Shakespeare, Dickens or Joyce.
Of course, 99 percent of the time, the movies don’t even try. And if they do,
most of us miss it.
The second viewing of “Gravity” gave me a
chance to think a bit more about what Cuarón was really after, discovering—as
you may have already done—that this isn’t a film about space or astronauts in
dire situations or even persevering over incredible odds. It’s about
loneliness; the inevitable realization that on most levels we must navigate the
obstacles of life on our own. No matter how many supportive friends and family
members we surround ourselves with, no matter how much we love and are loved,
man is essentially on his own in this unexplainable, unmapable journey.
The writer-director has found the perfect
metaphor for our existence on Planet Earth: the soundless, airless, unending nothingness
of space. Relying on sophisticated technology to keep her safe, Stone is set adrift,
seemingly doomed, when damage is done to this essential infrastructure. She’s alone, beyond what’s imaginable back on
terra firma, and forced to look inward to keep going.
It really hit me when Kowalski (George Clooney)
is trying to get Stone’s mind off their horrific situation and asks her about
who is waiting for her back home. That’s when we learn that Stone’s young child
has died and that she seeks comfort in voices on the radio. On one level it
humanizes the main character, but more importantly it adds another level of
loneliness to this seemingly has-it-all, brilliant scientist. Has she sought
out the endless vacuum of space because her life is equally without hope? And
then, when tragedy strikes, she’s left, like so many in this world, drifting
and waiting to run out of oxygen. If this isn’t existentialism, I don’t know
what is.
Of course,
this is a somewhat pessimistic viewpoint of a film that is, on the surface, rather
life affirming. (And, I’ll admit, I have
yet to read a similar view of the picture.) But that’s what I see in “Gravity,”
and, at least for me, it makes it an even richer, more complex work; a story of
both survival and hopelessness, the refusal to give in even as you recognize
that you’re going to be doing it all on your own—both the living and the dying.